And people liked to use "flip flop" and Kerry in the same sentence... :confused:
i like the term sub-humans rather than people
"Dammit Jim!! I'm a guitarist not a roadie...so haul my gear"
And people liked to use "flip flop" and Kerry in the same sentence... :confused:
Originally Posted by: z0s0_jpyou got it, but i don't think you realize it.
Originally Posted by: stacknyWhat was the correct response to 9/11?
Originally Posted by: Leedogg
Attacking Iraq made as much sense as invading Canada after 9/11. Your average joe loves seeing an Arab and thinking terrorist. None of the highjackers were from Iraq, but you know where most of them were from? Saudi Arabia. I'm sure you know about the connections (business and personal) that Bush (and his administration) has to that country.
Originally Posted by: stacknyNow lets not go overboard. Im not even gonna address that first sentence because you and I both no thats not true and just a rediculous statement. Saudi Arabia wasnt the threat. The Saudi Arabian government is allies of ours. Iraq is not friends of ours, harbors terrorists, and for the 50th time has bs'd our weapons inspectors for years.
Originally Posted by: chucklivesoninmyheartWhen since are we the world police?(besides team america).Giving iraq ultimatums?The U.S dosn't run the world...iraq was not enganging the U.S at all(yeah,we fly over a no fly zone,get shot at and declare a war...great).
Originally Posted by: chucklivesoninmyheartCorrect...we ditched congress too :p
Originally Posted by: Cryptic ExcretionsYou missed the point dude. Canada had just as much involvement in 9/11 as Iraq did. None. So what difference would it make if we attacked Canada instead because they both had the same involvement. All Bush would've had to have said is Canada has WMDs. It's only ridiculous if you don't allow logic in. And just because Iraq hasn't been truly honest about their weapons inspection doesn't mean they're always lying. And considering we still haven't found the weapons we went in for it doesn't look good in our favor.[/QUOTE]
France is the only other country on this planet that is more worthless than Canada. And what do ya know! France used to own it!
Anyways, youre whole post is just one big heap of silliness. Youre not honestly that naive are you? How can you give any benefit of a doubt to them?
And Id also like to clarify, its a war on terrorism, not a war on Iraq.
[QUOTE=Leedogg]I bet there are way more terrorists in Iraq now than before. Destablizing a volatile middle east is dangerous business.
Originally Posted by: stacknyFrance is the only other country on this planet that is more worthless than Canada. And what do ya know! France used to own it!
Anyways, youre whole post is just one big heap of silliness. Youre not honestly that naive are you? How can you give any benefit of a doubt to them?
And Id also like to clarify, its a war on terrorism, not a war on Iraq.
Originally Posted by: PonyOneyou know, there's really nothing wrong with France... to be honest I've met a lot of really, really nice people from France, and the whole French-hating thing is just ignorant to me. If you wanna talk about "worthless" countries, there are places like Latvia, Estonia, Laos, etc that have negligible GNP's, don't really contribute to world culture, and just sort of sit there...
Bush's overstepping of congress to fight a war was just plain wrong, and IMHO perfectly illustrates perfectly how he has absolutely no regard for how this country is set up to work.