Religion, Politics, and Armegeddon

clinton was a moronic idiot wuss who was too concerned about being impeached for getting his dick sucked when iraq booted the inspectors and he didn't do the job that should have been done.


bush is a **** shaved ape with pupateer karl rove behind him making sure he does what's needed for all his republican friends to milk all the money they can.


reagan was a simpleton moron who understood economics like he understood what he had to eat the day before.


bush sr was former head of the CIA...if that doesn't clue you in to how evil and ruthless he was the you're clueless and deserve to have your right to vote taken away.


we haven't had a good president since way before WWII....the problem with WWII is that we got the nuclear bomb and so we got the power to abuse. we haven't had a good leader since lincoln. i'd say teddy roosevelt but he was way too zealous about being the best and wars for his own good. hell, the man nearly killed his own son in that whole process!

anyone who claims that modern politics offers anything other than **** is a clueless moron who has been duped by the lies around you.

Originally Posted by: stacknyHey Michael Moore Junior, why dont you just start taking random segments of my posts and sticking em together to make me sound like more of an ass than I already am. Thats not what I meant at all, but Id go to war if I had to without a second thought. Im in college right now, and if I wasnt, Id probably be in Iraq.

college will be there ...join up big boy!!

Originally Posted by: stacknyHey Michael Moore Junior, why dont you just start taking random segments of my posts and sticking em together

i would rather continue to quote you

Originally Posted by: z0s0_jpi would rather continue to quote you

no, you really did take what he was saying out of context.

he said "I'd love to go to war with france"
and you quoted him as "I'd love to go to war"
bit of a difference there

what is the difference??? war is war. whether you you would LOVE to go to war with france, sweden or lithuainia, it's a sick way of thinking. my point was war is not something one should LOVE to do ........ thinking before speaking is a lost art. but your right...he said he "would love to go to war with france" so that is acceptable :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by: 6strngs_2hmbkrsno, you really did take what he was saying out of context.

he said "I'd love to go to war with france"
and you quoted him as "I'd love to go to war"
bit of a difference there

why the hell would a war with france matter? they're the least of our worries considering their own civil unrest....or are you that ignorant to the world around you that you didn't know there were riots going on in france?

hey, know what? france has some dispicable sides...but until america fixes it's own dispeicable sides, i say we shut up about france and fix our own problems. starting with this racist, homophobic, hate-driven presidency.

france is a bunch of annoying snooty spoiled euro-trash....yeah...sure....great....how about we deal with the trash and the idiocy going on in our own country first before we concern ourselves with other countries that are of no consequence to us.

Originally Posted by: tehplatypuswhy the hell would a war with france matter? they're the least of our worries considering their own civil unrest....or are you that ignorant to the world around you that you didn't know there were riots going on in france?

hey, know what? france has some dispicable sides...but until america fixes it's own dispeicable sides, i say we shut up about france and fix our own problems. starting with this racist, homophobic, hate-driven presidency.

france is a bunch of annoying snooty spoiled euro-trash....yeah...sure....great....how about we deal with the trash and the idiocy going on in our own country first before we concern ourselves with other countries that are of no consequence to us.

I don't have full power yet but DO NOT bypass the language filters you know that by now. You may be in trouble once somebody with some clout reads this. Come on I didn't start this thread so everyone could be foul mouthed and rip on eachother. I wanted a place for ideas and theory to prosper not get bashed. ****. This is how the word should appear.

Originally Posted by: magicninjaI don't have full power yet but DO NOT bypass the language filters you know that by now. You may be in trouble once somebody with some clout reads this. Come on I didn't start this thread so everyone could be foul mouthed and rip on eachother. I wanted a place for ideas and theory to prosper not get bashed.

did i go too far? i apologize...i'll take out the stuff...

Thank you and try not to do it again. Some of these super mods rule with an iron fist. ;)

Originally Posted by: magicninjaThank you and try not to do it again. Some of these super mods rule with an iron fist. ;)

might help if we collectively delete all these posts about it and leave the rest to PM. eh? :)


and i apologize again...i'm not one to take for granted one inch of my constitutional rights as an american. get a little too passionate sometimes, i guess.

edit: you know i'm actually kind of embarassed, though that i forgot about the rules here and yet went around the censor barriers.....i should be much better with my words to beable to get my point across without such words. that's a fault of my own and quite embarassing now that i realize it. :/

It really wasn't to big a deal. Just a friendly reminder. :)
I'm sure nothing will come of so don't worry about it. Just remember the rules. ;) This goes for everyone replying to this thread. Your not the first to be told and unfortunatly I'm sure you won't be the last. Just so you guys know read the tag under my nic.

#1) Constantly circumventing or abusing the language filter by posting obscene language is definitely not allowed. Occasionally if it's part of a joke or if there's a specific purpose to getting a humorous point across it's fine ...up to a point.
But inciting anger or flaming someone with things like "bull****", or purposely altering the spelling of words like "f u * *" etc... is not allowed... period.
Replacing letters in obscene words that are obvious attempts to circumvent the language filter will get you banned.

Originally Posted by: magicninjaIt really wasn't to big a deal. Just a friendly reminder. :)
I'm sure nothing will come of so don't worry about it. Just remember the rules. ;) This goes for everyone replying to this thread. Your not the first to be told and unfortunatly I'm sure you won't be the last. Just so you guys know read the tag under my nic.

yeah, i let my passion get the best of me over my reason....man, and i just took a personality test...the jung personality type test and it said i'm an INFP....i used to be an INTP....i've moved a little more to my emotional side.

Originally Posted by: tehplatypusbush is a f*cking shaved ape with pupateer karl rove behind him making sure he does what's needed for all his republican friends to milk all the money they can.

He's quite simian alright, but I'd liken him more to a smirking chimp.

Originally Posted by: z0s0_jpwhat is the difference??? war is war. whether you you would LOVE to go to war with france, sweden or lithuainia, it's a sick way of thinking. my point was war is not something one should LOVE to do ........ thinking before speaking is a lost art. but your right...he said he "would love to go to war with france" so that is acceptable :rolleyes:

It was a friggin joke due to the French's military history. You took a segment of what I said and used it. I dont really want to go to war with France, but it would be a breeze if it happened.

Originally Posted by: LeedoggHe's quite simian alright, but I'd liken him more to a smirking chimp.

hrmmmmmm maybe so.....


regardless, bush isn't the one in power, rove is.

Originally Posted by: stacknyIt was a friggin joke due to the French's military history. You took a segment of what I said and used it. I dont really want to go to war with France, but it would be a breeze if it happened.

So it's ok to joke about trouncing weaker countries but it's strictly against the rules to mock a dead guy?

Originally Posted by: Cryptic ExcretionsSo it's ok to joke about trouncing weaker countries but it's strictly against the rules to mock a dead guy?

If that country is France.....Yes.

What did France do to you again?

Originally Posted by: LeedoggWhat did France do to you again?

seriously, what's with the racism? there's no need for that.

Originally Posted by: stacknyIf that country is France.....Yes.

YAY, Bigotry! I wish this guy wasn't the only other conservative voice here. Oh well.