Originally Posted by: Cryptic ExcretionsYou missed the point dude. Canada had just as much involvement in 9/11 as Iraq did. None. So what difference would it make if we attacked Canada instead because they both had the same involvement. All Bush would've had to have said is Canada has WMDs. It's only ridiculous if you don't allow logic in. And just because Iraq hasn't been truly honest about their weapons inspection doesn't mean they're always lying. And considering we still haven't found the weapons we went in for it doesn't look good in our favor.[/QUOTE]
France is the only other country on this planet that is more worthless than Canada. And what do ya know! France used to own it!
Anyways, youre whole post is just one big heap of silliness. Youre not honestly that naive are you? How can you give any benefit of a doubt to them?
And Id also like to clarify, its a war on terrorism, not a war on Iraq.
[QUOTE=Leedogg]I bet there are way more terrorists in Iraq now than before. Destablizing a volatile middle east is dangerous business.
And Id bet your wrong. And even if theyre are, they arent half as dangerous as they were because theyre not getting any money from all the ring leaders that have been taken out.
Dont shoot yourself in the head.