View post (a moral dilemma)

View thread

SLY
Un-Registered User
Joined: 08/08/02
Posts: 1,613
SLY
Un-Registered User
Joined: 08/08/02
Posts: 1,613
02/11/2003 3:16 am
Look dude , it's not just a moral issue , it's about logic too .
The situation now is that there is no war , so in order to start a war , you need REALY GOOD reasons , proves & evidence of violations ... But what's happening is that the U.S. is flipping it over , they want Iraq to do prove that there were no violations in order to to prevent the war.

And what any viewer can admit , Iraq has responded quite nicely till this day ... They accepted ALL the UN resolutions including the last one, they're co-operating nicely with the inspectors (ok, Blix said they're willing to see more co-operation but he didn't say that Iraq isn't co-operating , he also asked for time to finish his job) , opened presidential sites for inspections (this was never allowed before, and previous UN resolutions didn't demand opening these sites from Iraq) , and today they accepted U2 flights over Iraq to help the inspections and to prove that they got nothing hidden anywhere.

As everybody can see , the U.S. government is always coming with new requirements from Iraq , just in order to attack once Iraq refuses to comply with any of these... On the other hand , Iraq is doing their job , and they're making all they can do to fulfill these requirements... And now that the U.S. has SOLD OUT of new ideas, they claim that Iraq is just wasting time , and they will accept nothing less than changing the regiem (something the U.S. is quite sure that Saddam would never accept).
I don't know why can't you see that the U.S. government is just playing games and their only goal is invading Iraq , with or without international approval , whether Iraq is found guilty or not.
Believe me this has got nothing to do with WMDs or Saddam's regiem , it's just something on the american agenda that we cannot see now.

Here's a new one : I've just heard that some Iraqi opposition leaders are offering the U.S. HALF the funds of Iraqi oil after removing Saddam.
Pretty reasonable, isn't it? Specialy that the U.S. economy isn't in the best shape , so from where the hell are they supposed to fund such a big war without more declines in the U.S. economy ?

If the U.S. realy wanted a peacefull solution , they'd try to force Iraq to make some political corrections , democratic elections with the UN supervision begining with the parliament... Not ORDERING Saddam to step out , and saying "and by the way , there's no negotiation" (qoute from Mr. Bush) ... Dude , does this sound like a man who is ready for a peacefull solution ?