View post (a moral dilemma)

View thread

SLY
Un-Registered User
Joined: 08/08/02
Posts: 1,613
SLY
Un-Registered User
Joined: 08/08/02
Posts: 1,613
02/07/2003 12:53 am
Originally posted by Raskolnikov
Next, the Iraqis could account for their weapons stockpiles. As an example, Iraq admists to producing 8,500 liters of Anthrax (the UN inspection teams estimate it was actually 25,000 liters), but to date NOT ONE LITER HAS BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR. Not a single one. Nothing saying "it was destroyed at location X on day Y, and we destroyed it by method Z." Instead they just claim they don't have it any more.
-Third, Saddam could stop trying to import weapons materials such as equpiment to enrich Uranium or rocket engines with ranges that exceed the limits set by the UN. They've been cought doing both in the past three months.
-Fourth, the UN inspectors still aren't being allowed to use U2 spy planes to perform reconosance. This leaves the inspectors stuck inspecting locations they knew about four years ago, but no way to scout for new sites. This is one many ways in which the Iraqi government is impeeding the inspectors ability to find new information.



For the Uranium thing , where do you think Saddam can hide nuclear weapons out of sight ? In his pants ?!
Don't you know that the inspectors are measuring nuclear radiation everywhere in Iraq , in streets , villages , etc. ... They also leave a fixed apparatus for that reason just to make sure that inspected areas could never be used for hiding these stuff in the future.

And for the spy planes ... Does the U.S. realy need spy planes ? What about Spy Satelites , I hear they're very sophisticated these days to the extent that it can catch a car number with very clear details ... Or is it just american propaganda?
If it's true, why don't the U.S. just scan the hell out of Iraq , trace sites that could be suspected for hiding WMDs , and give inspectors some maps so that they find real proves & evidence instead these crappy speaches in the media all the time.

And about moving stuff from sites and getting them back after being inspected , it's realy rediculous ... Each site has been inspected over and over and all the visits should not be expected by the Iraqies ... I'm sure the inspectors were taught how to be unexpected... So how could the Iraqies be so sure that one site is more secure and secret than others to hide their stuff in ?

As a matter of fact , every inch inside Iraq is could be the inspectors next target ... And I'm sure that Iraq realy knows what could be the consequences of finding hidden WMDs , so they'd better not be hiding something.

And till the U.S. or the inspectors find some real hidden WMDs inside Iraq , the U.S. should never attack.