Does it? Im not sure if they know what they are doing or just playing fast on the fingerboard.
Does Heavy Metal have much theory into it?
# 1
Do you think Steve Vai plays heavy metal ?
As long as people like it dose it matter ?
As long as people like it dose it matter ?
My instructors page and www.studiotrax.net for all things recording.
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
# 2
Like Doc said, as long as people, as long as YOU like it, it doesn't matter. Really though, anything known about music, be it chords, scales, aprs, methods of tuning the instrument etc... its all theory. Even if the music is completely incoherent, there is theory behind it, in theory. :D
Right?
Right?
Music rules, beer rules. Music about beer cannot be topped.
# 3
Yea I know what all yall mean.
No Im not asking if metal is musically inclined, just asking if alot of it is based of musical theory such as Jazz. I love metal, so dont get the wrong idea.
No Im not asking if metal is musically inclined, just asking if alot of it is based of musical theory such as Jazz. I love metal, so dont get the wrong idea.
# 4
Well what about EVH or Randy Rhodes? Do you think they spent a lot of time learning theory ? Is there contribution to contemporary music as great as say Charlie Parker ?
My instructors page and www.studiotrax.net for all things recording.
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
# 5
Originally Posted by: Dr_simonWell what about EVH or Randy Rhodes? Do you think they spent a lot of time learning theory ? Is there contribution to contemporary music as great as say Charlie Parker ?
Doc, don't ya know you're not supposed to answer a question with a question?
HAHA, I just did it.
Anyways, most heavy metal is written in minor keys, and most solos take place in the natural minor mode. There are many exceptions, but that is a general formula.
Sometimes I hit notes only dogs can hear.
# 6
Yes, like James Hetfield said "Major sounds too happy for us"
Music rules, beer rules. Music about beer cannot be topped.
# 7
Alucard...check out this link...click on the 'download' tab.
http://www.necrophagist.de/Seiten/necrophagist_main.html
check all of the sound samples...technical death metal at its finest.
http://www.necrophagist.de/Seiten/necrophagist_main.html
check all of the sound samples...technical death metal at its finest.
Try once,fail twice...
# 8
Originally Posted by: chucklivesoninmyheartAlucard...check out this link...click on the 'download' tab.
http://www.necrophagist.de/Seiten/necrophagist_main.html
check all of the sound samples...technical death metal at its finest.
cool stuff
the guitarist has it goin on
# 9
Metal's as technical as you like. Most of it's pretty simple stuff but then you get really weird stuff like Meshuggah which is offbeat with heaps of different scales and harmonies that keep you guessing even if you've heard it hundreds of times. I wish I could get into it but it's just too clever for me to comprehend even though I really respect their awesome lead guitarist for sounding like a mixture of Allan Holdsworth and George Lynch.
If I couldn't laugh at myself how could I laugh at someone less ridiculous?
# 10
Originally Posted by: Dr_simonWell what about EVH or Randy Rhodes? Do you think they spent a lot of time learning theory ? Is there contribution to contemporary music as great as say Charlie Parker ?
I think Randy Rhodes spent a ton of time learning theory. He was a classical guitarist before he joined Ozzy...Also, Van Halen was an accomplished pianist, so I assume he knew quite a bit of theory. Certainly their contribution is not as great as someone like Charlie Parker, but his contribution was not as great as, say, Bach or Mozart as far as developing music goes. Besides, comparing guitarists to jazz band leaders like Charlie Parker is odious. VH and Rhodes don't have to arrange all the other instruments in the band and whatnot, all they have to do is solo. What about John Petrucci and Mike Portnoy (if ANYBODY replies to this with some moronic response like "those d00ds RAWK!!!1" I will kill everyone)? Those are two songwriters that know much more theory than I do at the moment, and it becomes apparent in their work. But if we're going to play the "who had the most effect on contemporary music?" game, then we might as well just go straight to Bach who basically made it possible and skip the whole "argument" thing.
# 11
those d00ds RAWK!!!1 (Sorry Jolly I just couldn't help my self !!)
My instructors page and www.studiotrax.net for all things recording.
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
# 12
I agree with you on many levels however I think you have taken the statement out of context.
In terms of impact, and I'm not talking about absolute contribution to global music theory, how many people have heard music by RR relative to CP ?
At the end of the day music is about opinions, it is not a quantifiable entity. Consequently to say one is "better" than the other is a bit of a misnomer.
In terms of impact, and I'm not talking about absolute contribution to global music theory, how many people have heard music by RR relative to CP ?
At the end of the day music is about opinions, it is not a quantifiable entity. Consequently to say one is "better" than the other is a bit of a misnomer.
My instructors page and www.studiotrax.net for all things recording.
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
my toons Brought to you by Dr BadGAS
# 13
Originally Posted by: Dr_simonIn terms of impact, and I'm not talking about absolute contribution to global music theory, how many people have heard music by RR relative to CP ?
Oh, I completely agree with you. Sorry if I the way I spoke was a bit convoluted, I'm simultaneously studying for a French test I have in about half an hour. What I was meaning to say is that RR was not the musical genius that someone like Charlie Parker or Miles Davis was. Also I think Rhodes worked in a genre with (as Ian from Spinal Tap says) more selective appeal. CP worked in a genre that many more people could appreciate musically.
At the end of the day music is about opinions, it is not a quantifiable entity. Consequently to say one is "better" than the other is a bit of a misnomer.
Again, totally agree, and it's what I was getting at (albeit in a roundabout Stupid McStupid way). I just meant Rhodes and Parker were working in such different fields of music that their influences one modern music are incomparable. Every time I hear a diminished run in a metal solo nowadays I think of Randy Rhodes. Parker was working in a more mainstream (but certainly not less respectable) field and thus effected mainstream music.
# 14
P.S. I'm going to kill everyone.
# 15
speaking of metallica, a large part of thier music comes from minor classical scales as is the case with much heavy metal music. shredding is usually just a simple riff from a classical scale played at sonic speed.
# 16
Then explain a lot of the King Diamond stuff I play, and Creeping Death...a lot of majors in that music
# 17
well Creeping Death is only 1 song out of their 200
# 18
Kirk Hammet (hes the lead guitar player in metallica. for those that dont know?) Anyways he knows how to play classical guitar. And James Hatfield (the rhythm guitarist of metallica) he knows how to play blues. Im assuming that this would mean the this particullar band does know, and incorporate music theory. You can see them play these styles on a 2 video box set of making the black album and the black album tour.
Bass guitar is the answer to everything
# 19
Look up the Natural Minor scale and the Harmonic Minor scale.
Learn them in E minor and A minor and you can play basically every Metallica solo.
Kirk mainly stayed in Natural Minor.
Learn them in E minor and A minor and you can play basically every Metallica solo.
Kirk mainly stayed in Natural Minor.
Sometimes I hit notes only dogs can hear.
# 20