Originally posted by Raskolnikov

Originally posted by SLY

Originally posted by Raskolnikov
If they don't have the weapons, why are they telling blatant lies about things we can confirm?

And why doesn't the U.S. wait for the inspectors to find WMD's inside Iraq (if there's any) before attack ?

Because the more time that goes by, the more deaths on both sides. If one has to fight, fight to win.

Answer me this, Iraq is allowed no nuclear programs of any kind, but it still employs nuclear scientists. What gives?
Iraq is even today attempting to import high-grade aluminum cylinders (usualy used in centerfuges for enriching Uranium), but claims they're for conventional rockets... even though they're not allowed those rockets anyway. Why?

[Edited by Raskolnikov on 02-06-2003 at 07:58 PM]

Both sides ? what both sides ? From what I know is that only Iraqies are dying , and mostly of cancer ... Do you know why ?
Cancer rates have increased significantly in Iraq after the war , also since the war ended lots of mutated kids have been born , what is so specialy related that & was used in this war , huh?
Depleted Uranium !
So, it's not the sanctions mainly, it was moslty due to American weapons ... BTW , I'm dead sure that Iraq can feed their own people regardless of the sanctions , at least more than Sumalia , Sudan and a lot of other places in the world specialy in Africa.


What do you want them to do with nuke scientists then ? Kill them so they don't get blame for developing nukes , or give them to the U.S. so that the U.S. (Iraq's main enemy now) benifit from them?
Nuclear scientists job isn't just developing nukes ... They teach in colleges and so , it's very normal for any non-nuclear country to have nuclear scientists without being accused for developing nukes.
Sorry , but it's a very silly question !


Who said they aren't allowed to have conventional rockets ?? According to the sanctions , Rockets should not exceed a given limit (2 or 3 hundreds as I can remember, not sure though).