Originally posted by Raskolnikov
The inspections process was a means to give Iraq a last chance to avoid a continuation of the war, but to avoid that continuation, Iraq was under obligation to PROVE, I repeat, PROVE that it has no more WMDs or WMD programs. The only thing Iraq has proven is that it isn't telling the truth, and more importantly, that it's trying to hide something. What is the logical conclusion of this? Why would Iraq disarm only to act like they haven't? Why on Earth would Iraq do that? It doesn't make sense to me. Why would Iraq (even since these last inspections have started) attempt to purchase key equipment for enriching Uranium if it had no nuclear weapons program?
And if you think that biological and chemical weapons can't be made in spite of the sanctions, you're sadly mistaken.

And how the hell would you like Iraq to prove they have no WMDs ? It's not logical dude , not at all !
Iraq claims they don't have WMDs , they let the inspectors go everywhere they please , they opened Presidential palaces for inspections ... What else would you like them to do ?!

What is more logical is : Why don't the U.S. prove (Solid Proves) that Iraq realy has WMDs , instead of claims about connections with Al Kaeda , not full co-operation with inspectors and other Bullsh*t the U.S. come up with time to time, before talking about war ??!!

It's simply as I said ... The U.S. government is completely determined to invade Iraq no matter what !