Clicky

View post (a moral dilemma)

View thread

SLY
Un-Registered User
Joined: 08/08/02
Posts: 1,613
SLY
Un-Registered User
Joined: 08/08/02
Posts: 1,613
02/06/2003 12:54 am
Originally posted by Raskolnikov
Iraq invaded Kuwait. The Iraqi army was driven out by an international coalition and ordered by the international community to disarm and [u]PROVE[/u] that it has disarmed. After OVER A DECADE LATER Saddam has proven NOTHING other than that he's still playing games with the arms inspectors.



Thats right ... If you removed Saddam a decade ago , no one would have opposed you cuz it was going to be a reaction to the Kuwait invasion.

But now after a decade , the point of removing Saddam from power has lost its good reasons ... Every thing is ok in Kuwait , Inspectors never found any hidden WMD in Iraq , Saddam and his regiem are contained by very strict sanctions & inspections that would never give him a chance to develope or manufacture WMDs.

Now you're worried about the poor Iraqies who suffer from the sanctions.
There are several ways to correct life in Iraq while keeping Saddam contained by the inspections ... The U.S. just don't want to see them.

Dude , it realy obvious that the U.S. is realy determined to invade Iraq regardless of the excuses , legality , expenses , consequences , casualities , oppositions , blah blah blah , etc. of such a war .