Originally Posted by: adamstockerHi,
I am having a great time on this site and just moved on from fundamentals onto rock lessons.
Had a quick question, I understand the Key chord identification structure of 1st, 4th & 5th, simple enough, and also understand that although usually the first note/chord played is the key a tune is in it doesnt always work that way. I know you can play a song in a key and but start with a note/chord that is not in that key.
But what if you create a tune that doesnt follow the 1, 4, 5 structure? I came up with a part of a tune (only very short) of Amaj>Amaj flat>C#minor (barre chords)>A (rock open)>C(open)>B7>Emaj. How do I figure out what key it is in as there is nothing in there that fits into the 1,4,5 format but still sounds okay that the chord progression works ?
Sorry its a bit of a fiddly question.lol.
That was a fun exercise Adam! I did more or less the same thing that Christopher recommended and came up with almost the same answer. Well, I initially thought A which has nearly as many notes (1 less) than E when compared to your progression. But on closer inspection and guided by Chris's analysis, I agree that E is the better option. In listening to it, the final two chords (B7-E) sounds like a finish. That is to say, when you hear the E, it sounds like you have come home and can put on your slippers and call it a night.
Anyway, to amplify and extend what Chris said (and hopefully not say anything incorrect):
(1) when analyzing a progression with the intent of identifying a key, you can somewhat disregard chords that aren't in the key if they are a dominant chord (often but not always a dom7) to the chord that follows (i.e., if G7 is followed by C, A7 is followed by D, B7 is followed by E, E7 is followed by A, D7 is followed by G, etc [note that if you count up from each of the final chords to the preceding chord you go up 5 letters - i.e., a perfect 5th]). That dominant chord is often inserted whether it is in the overall key or not (if it's not, it's called a secondary dominant) because it has the effect of propelling you to the chord that follows (which is in the key) which is quite useful musically and helps create flow. Maybe that sounds like gibberish right now, but the tutorial Chris pointed you to goes over this in more detail and explanation. There are lots of other specific instances in which an out-of-scale chord is used, but that "secondary dominant" is probably the most common.
(2) Songs can often change keys, especially at clearly identifiable breaks in the song structure - like between the verse and the chorus. It's kind of a cliche, but not uncommonly the key will just go up in pitch (even if it's just a semi-tone or so) somewhere towards the end of the song (possibly with the goal of signalling that the end is coming and pumping a little more energy into the last bit to to maintain the listener's interest). So if chords, overall, don't fit well in any given key, it may help to look at different parts in isolation, or to see if there is somewhere during the course of the song where unexpected chords start showing up.
(3) Also, from what I have read, not all songs are written in a key. Some rock songs for example, have relatively simple chords that shift up and down in pitch in such a way that any attempt to identify a key would result in so many out-of-key notes that a key-based analysis would be more trouble than it's worth. For example, a song may use a series of major chords, or power chords, that are rooted on the notes of the minor pentatonic scale - chords like C major, D# major, F major, G major, A# major. So the chords kind of move in parallel. You might be able to make C sound like home base, but it's not a C major scale that you are playing in. Having said that, in my limited experience, that is not nearly as common as key-based songs.
Just seeing it on paper, I didn't think I'd find that progression very musical, but I played it and really liked it a lot!