Thanks Much,
Greg
Originally Posted by: RazboA Gibson (24 3/4") scale is about 1/4" less distance from 2nd to 7th fret vs. Fender (25 1/2") scale.
I have really short fingers, and I notice a big difference switching guitars. Aside from stretching to the max, using a shorter scale guitar will physically increase your reach. Fender Mustang's have a 24" scale... I don't have the fret chart in front of me, but that's around 1/2" shorter distance from 2nd to 7th than a Strat.
http://www.fender.com/products//search.php?partno=0273706504
Originally Posted by: KFS1972My Ibanez has a 24 frets, most strats I have seen have at least a couple less. Does that mean that the distance between the lower frets is longer or that there are simply more frets down on/over the body?
Originally Posted by: Douglas ShowalterI have met male and female players alike with very small hands whom seem to work through this obstacle. One thing to keep in mind that playing guitar is considered a physical feat, much like being an athlete. You are doing something in a manner of technique that the human body is not necessarily meant to do (or is natural.) That being said, don't let having small hands serve as a burden at all. I have taught students with huge hands and kids with tiny hands. It boils down to practice, patience, and time. Practice your technique but more over; fall in love with the process of learning.
Originally Posted by: RazboTrue words. Somebody posted about a famed jazz guitarist with only 2 fingers. Can't remember or find the post, but that's certainly inspirational. Talk about overcoming physical limitations!
Regards,
cm
Originally Posted by: carminemarottaIt was the great (greatest?) Django Reinhardt, his third and fourth fingers were almost paralyzed after an accident. He used them only to help with chords. All his solos were palyed with the first and second fingers. We have a tutorial on his style made by HP: http://www.guitartricks.com/tutorial.php?input=410
Carmine