Monster Cable vs George L's?


Andrew Sa
Registered User
Joined: 07/01/02
Posts: 1,612
Andrew Sa
Registered User
Joined: 07/01/02
Posts: 1,612
06/02/2007 7:41 am
Well, I am now needing to get my pedal board up and running again, and was wondering if anyone had a preference on this matter?

I use a Monster cable from my guitar into my board, and now need another one to come out of my board to my amp.
I have used George L's cables for the same purpose in the past and wasn't so happy with the results.
However for the patch cables from pedal to pedal, I dont think it'll be necesarry to fork out so much cash for Monster cable path cables...

What do you guys think?
Monster Cable Or George L's patch cables?
[FONT=Century Gothic]Hope is when we feel the pain that makes us try again[/FONT]
# 1
da_ardvark
Registered User
Joined: 07/11/06
Posts: 407
da_ardvark
Registered User
Joined: 07/11/06
Posts: 407
06/02/2007 1:26 pm
I've used George Ls for years with no problems. What exactly did you not like about them? They do tend to tangle a bit but that happens with most/all cables. Because of the short lengths, I thing the George Ls will be best.
# 2
PRSplaya
Full Access
Joined: 09/19/02
Posts: 3,941
PRSplaya
Full Access
Joined: 09/19/02
Posts: 3,941
06/03/2007 3:27 am
I'd go with the George L's. Simply because they will be a little cheaper, and by far easier to repair if one gets damaged. For patch cables, they will sound as good, if not better, than the overpriced Monster cables.
[FONT=Palatino Linotype]Tonja Renee's personal instructor[/FONT]

>HERE'S WHERE I AM NOW<
# 3

Please register with a free account to post on the forum.