Originally Posted by: Tonja_ReneeI would be careful with how much credibility you place on science.. I have worked with scientists for years, not in the field of evolution or other theories, but much smaller experiments for the corporate world. I have seen scientists create experiments or trials that will prove what their agendas want them to prove. They aren't being paid to find the truth, they are paid to provide evidence to support an agenda. And if a scientist comes across evidence that disproves or goes against their agenda, they disregard it and move on to the next experiment. I have seen this done many times. And I'm not naiive enough to beleive that this doesn't happen in every field of science. It just wouldn't be in the best interest for scientists to disprove their own theories. For every hypothesis or experiment that proves or provides evidence to support a theory, you will find hypotheses, evidence and experiments that disprove it...

I agree 100%. It's for that reason that I don't think that most scientific therories have any more credibility than religious ones. These are theories, and by definition theories are suggestions of an explanation for something that has none. I don't believe in the Big Bang or that we all evolved from single-cell organisms any more than I believe in religion. Both science and religion leave too much unexplained, and both science and religion ignore a lot of stuff in favor of the things that help their case. And since none of it can be proven, it all comes down to what you choose to believe.