im not tryin to sound like a scholar and im not gona say "i think". . . but from what ive gathered ive come to the conclusion that there is no conclusion to who is the better guitarist for various reasons mainly because of the "better" issue because better can be a very broad issue, If you want older more technical perfection and precission timing you probably like vaughn, had he eaten as much acid as hendrix he may have brought out the more inventive more creative style of music hendrix is famous for, not to say hendrix wasn't a musical genius and his type of creativity could be duplicated because it will probably never be and if it is it will never have the same kind of praise considering he was one of the first of his kind to be shown to the masses, i hope i havent taken a side on the issue because then i would be arguing and there should be no argument unless all factors-(the various reasons that contribute to this issue not being concluded) can be figured in and more than likely they can't, i could be wrong, but i also hope i kept a few more of the open-minded people who get caught in this from arguing too, and for those of you who "think" im a dip**** please dont respond to this because you could be keepin someone who has something intellectual to say from sayin it and for those of you who think what ive said make sense, right on man


oh yeah check out my good friend CLINT RIDDLE on myspace he has been a guitarist for about 2 or 3 years and has had his own style since he got his first guitar and has improved everytime gibson has given him another because he was endorsed by them at 16 which is cool but im not bragging im tryin to get his band noticed so he can move on from them because his talent and creativity is still evolving and there all stuck and try to keep him down with them because none of them will admit to being less talented than him because theyre all so much older and have played longer, PEACE