View post (Should he live? Should he die?)

View thread

tehplatypus
Registered User
Joined: 10/31/04
Posts: 531
tehplatypus
Registered User
Joined: 10/31/04
Posts: 531
12/02/2005 5:01 am
Originally Posted by: Jolly McJollysonWhile one could argue that he's saved many lives by changing so drastically, I believe that, without bringing his victims back to life, there are some crimes that cannot be undone.


by that same token, though, if he's now doing good works for society and effecting a change for the positive....would that not be worth keeping his life instead of executing him while other scum who just lay about remain in jail for equally harsh crimes.

i'm not saying that he should ever be let free or that anything can make up for the lives he's taken away*, but i am saying that it would seem that it'd be to the detriment of society for him to be executed at this point.


*there's actually disputes that his court case was even fair but that's another discussion for another day
okay...my post is done...goodbye.