Originally Posted by: Axl_Rose*shakes head*

Your right, the beatles were better, we should all stop encouraging bands like Oasis touring and making records :rolleyes:

Very few bands are original. Most bands are just a combination of influences of 2 or 3 others. I wouldnt say oasis are any less original than the average band. Yea they are notably similar to the beatles.. but what band wasnt influenced by the beatles? Id say Oasis were/are more similar to the Stone Roses actually.

It really bugs me when people look down on bands liek that. Or speak of them like they are worth less. Everything in life evolves from what was there before it. Should we start slagging our children because they are newer, unoriginal versions of ourselves! :D

Oasis were massive in the UK. They still are big. They have amazing songs that young people of this generation can relate to. My mum likes the beatles but their sound is utterly dated. Im not knocking anyone who still enjoys their music but its just a long way from what music has evolved to.

The point is, is that what makes a band good is the ablity to create original sounds that sound cooler then the last ones. Oasis lacks this talent as such they suck. The Beatles were so great because they knew how to do it. A professional band playing an out dated sound is pathetic.