View post (Well, kingdavid, since you asked...)

View thread

kingdavid
Registered User
Joined: 01/25/02
Posts: 1,149
kingdavid
Registered User
Joined: 01/25/02
Posts: 1,149
05/11/2004 3:59 pm
I should have posted this much earlier,but it kinda went into the background and I almost forgot about it.
But after hearing about Abu Ghraib(boy,don't we anti-war heads know how to spread the bad **** about this war!),it's come to the foreground.
First I answer the article Lorda refers to.
Although I'm a Kenya living some 3000 miles from the US,I'd say I'm a "democrat."I lean towards them.So I get defensive when they're to blame for something,as this article illustrates.
Be that as it may,what is being exposed here is a failure by the clinton adminstration to deal with the real clear and present danger.That,however,has nothing to do with the reason the Bush adminstration gave to the world for waging war with Iraq.
That's my take on it.And although the people in america questioning Bush's actions may have played a part in allowing 9/11 to take place,it doesn't change anything with regard to the credibility of Bush's war with Iraq.
Now,about Abu Ghraib,I wonder what you guys feel about it.
Anyone?....