Originally Posted by: shawmin02OK, so I have a question (albeit opinion based). Been playing guitar for 18 years. Pretty good, but I also know the more I learn the less I know (if that makes sense). My question is this... is PRS Private Stock that much better in terms of quality and tonewoods than the rest of the PRS line? In other words, are they really with the $10K+ price tag?
A relative and subjective answer.
Subjectively, no. My personal, non-data based answer is; once you get past $2500-$3000, you get diminishing returns. Dollars stop equaling quality and improvements. That's the 'relative' part. If you get a $500 Epiphone Les Paul versus a $2000 Gibson Les Paul, there is a difference. That's not to say that the Epi isn't a great instrument, but I hold that there is a difference and one that you can identify. At some point, you start paying for the exclusivity of having a special (eg - Private Stock) instrument.
I think the issue is even more pronounced when you get in to artist models (like an Ace Frehley 'Budokon' etc). There, you're paying for a guitar because it would be like playing Ace's instrument. Great, if you actualy like the same feel of a guitar as Ace....that, or you just wanna hang it on the wall.
And that's where the real answer lies; I want a guitar that I would enjoy playing and that is very likely not going to be found in an artist model and even to a private stock, it's pretty certain I can find a guitar I want to play for a lot less than $10k.
I'll end with this; the Les Paul in my avatar...I love playing that guitar. It was made for me. Not literally but it might as well have been. I didn't need to pay $10k for it. I didn't even need to pay $2k (it was a heck of a deal for a new guitar). It wants me to play it and I didn't spend a car loan on it.
