Originally posted by guitargod420
ive noticed that alot of tricks say van halen is better
that rhoads or rhoads was better than van halen
the simple fact is how do u people even compare
rhoads with van halen rhoads was clearly a way better
guitar player than van halen. i mean clearly what it is
is that i think all u van halen lovers never even gave rhoads a chance so for all u people who say van halen is
better than rhoads explain your thoughts:

Well, I believe that it is like this. A drastic analogy would be to compare Chuck Berry(van Halen) with Andre Segovia(Rhoads). Segovia is obviously a much more thought out player but Berry is and has a natural charismatic gift that only comes from god. Despite Segovias technique and musical genious, we are in fact talking about rock n roll here and it is traditionally played with the groin not the brain.