Originally Posted by: PonyOneso by your rationale, it's the fault of a president who had been out of office for a year and a half, and who had a pretty good economic upturn going on during his term? Well, if that's the case, then for consistency's sake you'd have to agree with me with what I said before in regards to it all being the Reagan admin's fault for stoking the fires in the first place!

If Bush was as awesome as you make him out to be, then why didn't he stop it? He only had the memos sent to him that an attack was imminent without intervention, and he only ignored them... I mean, who can blame the guy... the last thing a man needs when he's on vacation is work... OH WAIT, I forgot, it's the liberals! It's always their fault! Those dastardly liberals, sneaking behind every corner, vetoing everything that the Conservatives do to try to uphold the American right of way. It's a good thing Bush could care less, isn't it?

Do you really, honestly think that Bush and his administration has done a really good job of all this and that none of the blame for anything falls on him or the Reagan administration earlier on, or do you just find it easier to make quips on Clinton's sexual bloopers?

Actually, Bush got sworn in January meaning he was in office for about 9 months, which is not enough time to get anything done in the political world.

Dude. We are not the ones complaining. Remember who controls the media.

I like basically everything Bush has done other than the new medicare laws, which nobody understands.

And lets hold on a second here. I was joking about Clinton. Youd stoop so low to pick on a dead guy! Have some friggin respect. The guy was one of the best presidents in our nation's history.