Whoah... Deja Vu.

Originally Posted by: stackny:rolleyes: Please. Hussein not involved with 9/11? Thats just plain silly.[/QUOTE]
Almost as silly as a president who's full of ****. Almost as silly as a massive population that just assumes their president is telling the truth.

Originally Posted by: stackny
Lemme ask you something. What was the proper response to the 9/11 attacks? Sitting around and waiting for a permission slip from the UN? Sitting around and letting the terrorists organize another set of attacks? [/QUOTE]
Considering Bin Laden's name was the most commonly heard name post 9/11, my first reaction would be "Ok, let's go get Bin Laden" not "Ok, let's go to Iraq everyone." I never said we should just sit around, just go for the one we're supposed to be after.

[QUOTE=stackny]
Youre saying that a guy who has BS'd the UN's weapons inspectors for the past 20 years is not a threat. A guy who has no problem with gassin HIS OWN people. The world is a much safer place without Hussein still in power.

I didn't say he wasn't a threat. Just that we're in total hypocrisy. We gave him the weapons that he gassed his own people with when he was on our side and now we want to slap him on the hand for it?

[QUOTE=stackny]
I like Bush. Theres a couple things he could improve on, but I think hes done a great job with doing whats best for our nation.

And what exactly is what's best for "our" nation? Since you seem to be exalted enough to know how an opinion that should be discussed like what's "best" for something is, then perhaps you can inform me on what I've been missing all this time.