Originally Posted by: RedZepHaving never listened to Nirvana past the first song, I will go ahead and say Jimi. (DUHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) They are simple songs, but I'll never learn them, even if my friends aks me to. Screw that, I play the music I WANT to play, not what is easy. Being a "kid" I feel I have the right to express my opinion on that.
This is freaking silly. In the end "The Beatles" take the crown for most "revolutionary" band ever, and without The Beatles or Bob Dylan, where would Jimi Hendrix have come from? Where would Led Zeppelin have come from without those three? Where would have AC/DC come from without those four?
This is a retarded argument.
That's all I have to say,
RedZep
Perhaps. But Hendrix would still be doing what he was doing without the Beatles. He wouldn't have been as successful, but he was influenced more by the blues guys than the Beatles.