Originally Posted by: JFRICKNah man, I'm 28. I was in high school when Nirvana came out. I didn't like Kurt then either. His music is just plain boring to me. I think one of the main reason's kids like Nirvana so much is that they are the simplest songs for a beginner to learn.

Sorry if I sounded harsh in saying "what a joke", but the real joke is that he's actually considered a guitar hero by many. I just don't get it, but opinions are like assholes, everybody has one and they all stink....

Having never listened to Nirvana past the first song, I will go ahead and say Jimi. (DUHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) They are simple songs, but I'll never learn them, even if my friends aks me to. Screw that, I play the music I WANT to play, not what is easy. Being a "kid" I feel I have the right to express my opinion on that.

This is freaking silly. In the end "The Beatles" take the crown for most "revolutionary" band ever, and without The Beatles or Bob Dylan, where would Jimi Hendrix have come from? Where would Led Zeppelin have come from without those three? Where would have AC/DC come from without those four?

This is a retarded argument.

That's all I have to say,

RedZep