Personally, I find this entire debate (with the exception of the working out posts....) to be a bit ridiculous. I'm going to share a little something with you all here. When I was a young(er) man, I thought a lot about the superficial qualities in the women that I would date. Heck, I even married a beautiful woman who was TOTALLY wrong for me. I thought that as long as she was stunning, I could learn to live with those few other things that maybe I didn't agree with.
WRONG!
Truth be told, when I am looking for someone to spend time with now, it's WHO she is and not WHAT she is that matters most. And I truly hope that she is thinking the same thing about me. I was told by a very smart person that when seeking a mate, find someone who you love talking to because you'll be doing more of that than anything else.
As far as do 'hot' women play guitar?? Of course there are beautiful women out there who play guitar. That's like asking the question, are there bald guys who play the harp? I'm sure if you look hard enough, you can find one or two. The problem with the question that started the debate is this; you can't quantify 'beautiful' or 'hot'. I am sure that there are women you find attractive that I would not and vice versa. And I am positive that there are women out there who may see me as a decent enough looking guy and others may shriek and run. It happens.
Try to push yourself to be better than that. Try not to objectify anyone. People are people. Guitarist are guitarists.
Sorry for the preachy tone of this response but you want to call yourself a man? Then be a man. Be the very best man you can be. THAT is what women find attractive in a man.
[FONT=Tahoma]"All I can do is be me ... whoever that is". Bob Dylan [/FONT]