PDA

View Full Version : You gotta' hear this guy! Fastest ? Great technique!


rh287
01-11-2003, 02:33 PM
I slammed John Jaunese,(hard) in a email after reading on a forum the title of a demo album he put out called"The Fastest Guitar On Earth". I've always felt Malmsteen was and is the fastest since he came on the scene. To my complete suprise John responed very nicly to my attacks, which speaks volumes for his character.
So I listened to some of his soundbites on the net and was BLOWN away. Completly unique, effertless meshing of several unique styles and WAY sooo fast.I'm talking blistering speed, accuracy and technique.

This guy is one of the very few, who has in my opinion the any chance to go to the top with the likes of Malmsteen,Via, and Satriani. May take awhile, but we'll be debating him soon enough.

Here is his response to my scathing email to him, defending Malmsteen as the fastest/technicaly best in the world:


hello,
im gonna type in small print since you slammed me so hard. i loved the letter
you wrote. it was good, i have to admit. i do agree that yngwie would blow me
off stage. when i see him play live, it is almost majical. he inspires me
more than any guitarist i can think of. i cannot do that on stage like he
does. i dont even try to do what he does. he is to good at what he does to be
copied by anyone. yngwie is a very close friend of a friend of mine, and
because of that i had the honor of meeting him, he actually played one of my
guitars. preety cool. i dont think yngwie liked the title to my demo either.
as a matter of fact i dont even think he likes me at all. that doesnt change
my opinion of him. i respect him for his talent. i have been inspired by alot
of players- van halen,randy rhoads, vinnie moore, tony macalpine, all of whom
who were shredding in thier own style before they heard of yngwie
malmsteen(including myself). i was a shredder before i heard of yngwie. when
ynwie came out alot of guys ****in quite playing. one close friend of mine
said quote"this guy is playing the style i have been perfecting" he was an
awesome player, and he quite. you have to understand that yngwie was not the
first guy to shred. ask yngwie, he would tell you go listen to frank marino,
or especially uli roth, whom yngwie absolutely worships. do your homework.
dont believe me, find out for yourself. go to any search engine, and you
could verify what im saying.

as for the name of the demo"fastest guitar on earth". i knew that might raise
eyebrows, and i dont care. the cd is dedicated to the fastest guitarist on
earth whoever that may be. it even says that on the cd. am i the fastest
guitarist in the world? i doubt it. am i faster than yngwie? yes , who give
a ****. thats not why yngwie is so great. he is great because of his style.
why do you think yngwie is so insecure? i dont know, but maybe its because he
knows he is not the fastest. truth hurts. personally, i think he is ****in
paranoid. i mean if i was that famous, and rich, i would not care who was
faster than me. what a joke! maybe that paranoia helps him and others stay on
their toes. i dont know. i do find your opinion very interesting. thanks for
the honest letter. i respect someone who has a strong opinion.

take care,
JJJ

soundbits:
http://www.guitar9.com/undiscov31a.html

[Edited by rh287 on 01-11-2003 at 06:54 PM]

Zeppelin
01-11-2003, 03:07 PM
and where can we get some mp3's to base our humble opinion on? :)

Benoit
01-11-2003, 03:11 PM
One day people will realise that speed is only a question of how many hours you spend playing the same scales over and over again.

I was a big fan of Satriani until I heard Randy Roads and thought man he's fast. Then I heard Yngwie and I said man he's fast than I heard Paul Gilbert and I said .... do you see a pattern forming here?

There will always be fast guitar players, and they will always fall into the same pattern of giving too much importance in been faster and will losse the feeling in their music.

I try to get faster because it helps my general technique.

With time I realise the importance of feeling and transposing this into music. Speed doesn't impress me anymore, in fact when I see a new face trying to be faster than everybody else, I don't even listen to him. It's all the same thing to me.

I wouldn't even trade 10 Yngwie for one David Gilmour and I don't even listen to Pink Floyd! But the guy has more feeling in is music than most guitarist out there and I respect that a lot.

Maybe it's an age thing but as I grow older I let go of those fast empty solos and trade for emotion charged songs. Maybe it's just me.

The guy you're talking about seems to be an good fella at least.

The futur will show us if he makes the cut :)

[Edited by Benoit on 01-11-2003 at 02:13 PM]

rh287
01-11-2003, 07:34 PM
and where can we get some mp3's to base our humble opinion on?

http://www.guitar9.com/undiscov31a.html

N4Player
01-11-2003, 09:24 PM
Benoit - here, here. Another big difference (along with your points) is - speed is impressive to other guitarists, who buy about 5% of the marketed music. Gilmour appealed to the masses with his melodic riffs and solos. It comes down to the all mighty dollar - if you want to get rich, the speed licks aren't going to cut it. Satriani, Vai and Yngwie have all had troubles marketing their stuff over the years. They're great - but in a very small arena.

rh287
01-11-2003, 09:44 PM
Yes, but truly great guitarist aren't in it for just the money. It's the playing.

And all those guys you mentioned are doing very well financialy I assume. I know Malmseen is. He has sold triple platinum albums in Japan and The UK. Do you realize how much money that is?(his share) That guy is filthy rich. And he sell out stadiums in most parts of the world. Yep, Speed and showmanship is good for something, if you know how to use it. It can draw a overseas crowds like flies to s***.

noticingthemistake
01-11-2003, 10:34 PM
I have to agree with Benoit on this subject. I too was once a speed worshipper, but I also saw the same pattern. As I started listening to other music other than metal and rock. Which was what I was into those days (I still am). I found others like classical music and all those guys were incredibly fast at what they did too. Speed has been around for countless years, and probably will stay forever. Speed is a powerful tool in music.

Now, I find those who base everything on speed uninteresting anyone. Music is about feeling and putting your heart and soul into your music. It's not a competition to see who is better, or who is faster. Those who do it for those reasons, I think are missing the point. Those who just sell cd's based on their extraordinary guitar talent don't sell as many cd’s because there's no real musical connection with the listener. It's a just a showcase of look what I can do on the guitar. The only ones who can appreciate it are the guitarists; especially the ones who hope to be like that one day. I respect all musicians, even those who choose a different path, and because that's the path they have chosen. I am not one to judge another, never have and never will be. I have chosen my path, which has more to do with feeling and emotion. My goals are too be able to make my audience feel my music, not to say wow he's a great guitarist. That's also what I like in other guitarists. My opinion stated!

zepp_rules
01-12-2003, 12:09 AM
Where can i get Jaunese's email.



i've heard him before he is quite good. if you want other fast guitarists check out Jason Becker, Shawn Lane, and Marcus Paus.



Benoit - i agree speed isn't everything. although i tend to respect those that can play fast a little more because, like you said, it usually means that they've practiced a lot more and put a lot of hardwork into their instrument. malmsteen for example practiced 12 or something hours a day for many years.

i'm not putting down those who don't play fast. i love gilmour and definately would place him on a level as malmsteen and others. i just think that there's also a counter-belief that overgeneralizes speed. people say its just showing off that i carries no emotion. i would definately disagree. there's emotion in all music. and people like Shawn Lane and Jason Becker have written some great songs, while using their amazing speed.

speed, to me, is a tool like bending that should be used to accentuate a song. i think there are some songs that definately over do it. but there are songs that definately make it work. Black Star is a good example. Petrucci is another awesome guitarist that uses speed well.

i think you're right. speed is not everything and some people judge guitarists based on that. but speed can be good.

anyway, sorry for ranting.

mc9mm
01-12-2003, 09:43 AM
I've noticed the patern, but speed is still the most important for me because I simply think that speed is much more interesting than any other guitar-skill.
Now back to the subject:

I heard John Jaunese for the first time maybe 1,5 years ago, and man that guy is just awesome.
I wrote to him saying I liked most of his music, but you know
you could change this and that, and that really sucked, this was ok but this was just embarrassing etc.
(I didnt actually think it was embarrasing but
what the hell, I wasnt going to get an answer so why not sound like an annoying neoclassical expert?)
I was really surprised when I had recieved an email from
him the following day saying he appreciated my email
and my opinions.
He seems like a nice guy and he knows his way around the fretboard.
If I was a woman I could marry him. For sure.

Benoit
01-12-2003, 09:44 AM
True speed can be a great tool, some songs requires fast licks. I just hate people who put a ultra fast lick in a song that doesn't require it.

I feel like some fast guitarist are not willing to let there fast speed go for the good sake of a song in fear that someone tells them 'you can do better than that sissy solo'. I think, that' s my own opinion, that when you're consider one of the fastest player, you tend to only do fast lick to stay in that category.

I did take a listen at this guys music. I hate myself when I kepp a close mind. You can see that he does master his style but I wasn't caught by his song. It's technically good but I don't know it misses something. I can't get my finger on it but there's something in his songs that doesn't catch my ear. I must admit that he has a great technique, but in my opinion is not that fast. At least not enough to name his cd "that fastest guitar on earth".

noticingthemistake
01-12-2003, 10:47 AM
Yeah man, I'm not bashing on any guitarist who uses speed. Or saying that speed is needed, because it is absolutely accentual to any guitarist. Those you make an entire solo on speed, with very little melody, don't really get anything acrosst. I'm sorry but I'm tuned off man. I mean how much talent is in it, any idiot with a couple of years to waste can easily accomplish that kind of speed. All those solo's sound the same too, the same pentatonic lick played extremely fast, or whatever scale a particular artist uses. Does alot of thought really go into it. Take any scale, make a 3-4-5-> note pattern out of it. Play it as fast as you can, and randomly go through different modes of that scale. Or play really fast up or down a scale. Then they hit a note and bend the whammy bar or string. Then repeat the same thing again and again. When a guitarist uses tools for speed like this, I can't say much more. I like guys who add alot of melodic value to it, since the melody is the most paladiable to the ear. People can understand it and feel it more than a blazing fast riff. Fast licks in solos are great when needed, but when overused it's B.S. That guy john jaunese, nice melodic values but resorts too much to speedy licks. When thats all a guitarist has, thats only one dimension in talent. It's hard to say much more. To me, melody (feeling) is more powerful than speed.

mc9mm
01-12-2003, 10:56 AM
Every idiot in the world could've painted picassos paintings,
but people still like them and pay millions of $ for them.
People have discussed this speed vs feeling on 100000000
pages at least, so lets just end the discussion with:
Some people like speed alot, some people like it less,
some people dont like it at all, and theres not much
anyone can do about it.
Presto, problem solved.

noticingthemistake
01-12-2003, 11:21 AM
Sorry dewd. Just trying to express my opinion on the matter. I haven't been here since august of last year, so I wasn't able to be involved in any of those discussions. So I'm gonna say it here, if you don't like it. Then don't get in it. Why get so concerned over something like this? Us new guys are probably gonna say the same things you older guys said before, you don't need to remind me about it. Lighten up man.

N4Player
01-12-2003, 11:47 AM
I think Randy Rhoads did one hell of a job combining neo-classical speed licks into his (Ozzy's)songs. George Lynch (Dokken), also did/does a fine job.

mc9mm
01-12-2003, 11:48 AM
Im not concerned, its just that I've seen the exact same discussion many times, and I think its like discussing whether vanilla or chocolate is the best flavour.
Its not going anywhere.

noticingthemistake
01-12-2003, 12:06 PM
I know man, and it's probably going to be debated for as long as music is around. There's really nothing you can do about it, people are going to voice their opinions. I'm also not gonna read old threads just to see if someone else has written about it before. I'm only concerned about the present discussions. So man, If you've said your piece then just let it go. I'm not gonna discuss it anymore either. Unless something new is brought to my attention.

If people are going to debate whether chocolate or vanilla is better, just let them go at it. :)

aiwass
01-12-2003, 03:09 PM
I know this discussion is officially dead, but dare argue that speed can bring elements to the music that slow stuff just can't. For instance, guys like Petrucci, Shawn Lane and Marcus Paus (Norwegian unknown Guiness book of world records guitar speed master 'case you wondered) have all proved that if used the right way, extreme speed (not Rhoads and Hammett wussy-speed) can cause the listener to "read between the lines", to hear the music as a wave of sound as opposed to individual notes. If you don't know what I'm talking about, check out Shawn Lane's cover of "All along the Watchtower", The first Mr. Cucumber demo on mp3.com, or the end of Petrucci's solo on "the spirit carries on". . Doing this, the music transcends to a new level, since melody is abandoned for moods and textures.

I agree, speed isn't everything, and Malmsteen IS boring, but chops can be very effective as means of expression, and expression is what music is all about, right?

Dejan Sajinovic
01-12-2003, 03:28 PM
Hell yeah

rh287
01-12-2003, 10:05 PM
Where can i get Jaunese's email.



i've heard him before he is quite good. if you want other fast guitarists check out Jason Becker, Shawn Lane, and Marcus Paus.



Benoit - i agree speed isn't everything. although i tend to respect those that can play fast a little more because, like you said, it usually means that they've practiced a lot more and put a lot of hardwork into their instrument. malmsteen for example practiced 12 or something hours a day for many years.

i'm not putting down those who don't play fast. i love gilmour and definately would place him on a level as malmsteen and others. i just think that there's also a counter-belief that overgeneralizes speed. people say its just showing off that i carries no emotion. i would definately disagree. there's emotion in all music. and people like Shawn Lane and Jason Becker have written some great songs, while using their amazing speed.

speed, to me, is a tool like bending that should be used to accentuate a song. i think there are some songs that definately over do it. but there are songs that definately make it work. Black Star is a good example. Petrucci is another awesome guitarist that uses speed well.

i think you're right. speed is not everything and some people judge guitarists based on that. but speed can be good.

anyway, sorry for ranting.......

Click on sound bites, and when you get to the site click on hi email

Azrael
01-13-2003, 01:59 AM
Originally posted by rh287

Yep, Speed and showmanship is good for something, if you know how to use it. It can draw a overseas crowds like flies to s***.

Malmsteen has a superstar bonus - nothing more - its because he was the first gutiarrist that was realy sold for his speed. noone back in the early 80´s when malsteen went on stage was that fast (at least noone famous). and he still carries that reputation - THATS why he´s a megaseller - there are hundreds - THOUSANDS of guitarrists out there that can play malmsteens sh*t with one arm on the back - why are they not selling double platinum albums?

Fact: if you set fame and sales 1:1 with quality in music, then you didnt get whats goin on in music industry.

Malsteen was not MADE popular because his music is so brilliant - its just a plain ol´ bach-copy - he was sold because he did somethin noone has done before - and THAT can be sold very easily - he was basically an eye-catcher.

[Edited by Azrael on 01-13-2003 at 01:02 AM]

aiwass
01-13-2003, 10:16 AM
I couldn't agree more. Which is why Shawn Lane, who is twice as fast and three hundred times as musical as Yngwie Malmsteen, is not selling. With his probably 300 pounds and full beard, he is not an eye-catcher. Not the good kind, at least.

rh287
01-13-2003, 11:50 AM
OK,
I don't know what the Malmsteen bashing here is all about/ don't really care, but let's take a look.
Put aside his insramental work for a minute, and just take a look at his SONGS.
Now the songs don't have "welcome To The Jungle" quality lyrics, but then, for mid 80s aren't that bad. But the thing is, listen to the guitar on those songs. You want variation in speed? You want very good harmonic balance INJECTED IN A SONG? Many times you wonder how one could inprove on the increadable guitar within those songs. You want to hear the best guitarist of that time,and for years after? By a long, long shot? Then quit slamming Malmsteen, and give him the credit he deserves.

If you don't like his istramentals, then listen to a few of his better SONGS and crank up the guitar solos, they are truely amazing , even today. THEY FIT LIKE A GLOVE. He is slowing down,and has tendonitous. Many give plenty of well deserverved credit to Steve Via, who like John J. is a hell of nice guy. Satriani too. Just because Malmsteen can be a jerk sometimes, doesn't take away from the fact that he is the most successfull istramental guitarist of all time.

aiwass
01-13-2003, 11:55 AM
The only truly great song he ever wrote was Black Star. And the "good" parts of his solos are all stolen from Bach. Besides, when you say "varying his speed", do you mean compared to other shredders or compared to his own standard?
If you want REAL neoclassical shred AND kickas songs, check out Symphony X.

mc9mm
01-13-2003, 12:04 PM
I bet 5000+ guitarists can play faster than Yngwie, BUT:
Like you say, he was first, and now he's sort of a legend, and that you cant take away from him.
But he has one more huge advantage:
He is the perfect diva!
He can play, and he knows it.
If you go around claiming you're the fastest, the ebst, the most good looking, the hottest, nicest, wildest, richest guitarist in the universe, and Yngwie has done this for over 20 years, then people notice him.
Because after all, Malmsteen is one of the worlds most famous guitarists, but I dont think everyone actually LIKES him.
I bet a large percentage of his "fans" really REALLY hates him.
He is a show artist with a HUGE ego, and that has made him one of the most famous (if not the most famous) guitarist ever.
Example:
Yngwie malmsteen is strutting around on stage as usual, and while playing he flips his guitar and show the crowd the ferrari logo he has on the back of guitar.
Then he screams in to the mic: "I've got 2 of them!"
Hehehe, you gotta love him.

aiwass
01-13-2003, 12:08 PM
Now I hate him even more.

Good point about the showmanship, but I don't talk about fame. I just mean as a general musician.

Azrael
01-13-2003, 12:17 PM
I agree - Noone doubts malsteens technique and success. back in his days he might have been god on the guitar (which is not true, because there where other damn fast guitarrists too - but however), but back then you also had a Commodore C64 and it rocked - and what is it nowadays? a relic.

And for the songwriting aspect - his music is apart from a few bright moments just boring and carries very little of something that is called "musicality". No matter what you might think of his songs - fact is - and every musician who has a little mature experience will aknowledge this: they are musically worthless. He´s a major back rippoff. he´s done nothing new - he just played it 1000 times as fast - so whats the deal about it? just because i was the first person who farted into a microphone and recorded it, does the make me a great musician? especially guitarists always get blinded by the thrill of speed. more often than once those dudes are greenhorn-guitarrists who are impressed by the technique - and it seems impossible to make them clear that thats just the tip of the iceberg. music happens elsewhere - part of it is speed - but only a small part. you could give me 1000 malmsteens plus 100 al di meolas - i would not take them - been there - seen that.

Infact there are only two things a man needs in life - a toohbrush and Jeff Beck.

And maybe someday you might think back and realize that this was not just senseless malsteen bashig. ;) Dont get this the wrong way - if malmsteen is your god and the only thing in your musical universe, then be it so. Its your musical universe not mine - i keep on expanding.

[Edited by Azrael on 01-13-2003 at 11:19 AM]

aiwass
01-13-2003, 12:27 PM
Now Jeff Beck IS God. "Where were you" is probably one of the most demanding songs ever to pull off cleanly on guitar. The only other one I can think of is "Nadia", also by him. That thing is impossible.


Granted, a Shawn Lane solo at 300+bpm is slightly more difficult, but taken into consideration that both these songs are moderately to extremely slow, and the fact that I'd rather try to play an Yngwie tune that even attempt learning one of 'em, shows how virtuosity can be many things.

Jeff Beck might not be able to shred, but he has enough command over his instrument to rank with abnormal monster-players like the aforementioned Lane and Allan Holdsworth.

Yngwie is not on that list, by the way.

Azrael
01-13-2003, 12:43 PM
Thanx for the tip aiwass - thanx - nadia is friggen amazing - a real jeff beck! - now your turn - get into "a day in a life" (beatles cover) - he did the vocal part from lennon on the guitar. all george martin had to say about it was "It was Jeff's idea to tackle 'A Day In The Life', and he is the one guitarist who can make his instrument sing like the human voice. The orchestra was hardly needed for the climax; the guitar says it all."

rh287
01-13-2003, 01:34 PM
BECK? Granted a great guitarest, but my origional post was about a little differant type of instramentation.
I personaly never cared for Beck much as some of who you don't like a speed demon, (showoff)He never inspired me much, just my opinion. Don't mean to offend. Clapton either.

Speed guitar Vs smooth is a mute issue, I know full well as it has been debated here TOO much.

I posted about JOHN JAUNESE and his demo, knowing this speed issue would come up. But because of the poor sample quality you can get from the demo songs , it's realy hard to hear, what I think in a fully produced album will result, a differant metal rock, maybe neo classic sound. Defantly not a rip off. Granted "Speed of Light" was a speed demo, I think if you listen though, like the moderater of this thread said, the guy is freakin' awsome. But you have to listen to it, not just half ass hear it. No ofense.

Fron John's first fully produced album, I imagine, you may hear some great rock,and severe guitar, not copy cat s***!

I not saying this 'cause he emailed me back, just that I hear something differant there that's sounds as though John could defantly write some serious s***!

JOHN JAUNESE
01-13-2003, 02:09 PM
I THINK PLAYING FAST ALL THE TIME IS BORING. I HEAR THINGS IN MY HEAD BEFORE I PLAY THEM. IF I HEAR FAST IN MY HEAD, I KNOW ITS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SONG. IF I HEAR SLOW, THEN I PLAY SLOW. FEEL THE MUSIC. DONT GET CAUGHT UP IN THE TECHNIQUE. IF PLAYING FAST FOR YOU IS PLAYING THE SAME SCALE OVER AND OVER, THEN MAYBE YOU NEED TO LEARN MORE SCALES.
JJJ

rh287
01-13-2003, 02:14 PM
Did you CHECK who just wrote that last thread folks??

Azrael
01-13-2003, 02:35 PM
yeah - someone who does not know that typing in caps is considered as shouting and rudeness.

JOHN JAUNESE
01-13-2003, 02:45 PM
Im not here for you to correct puctuation, AND YES I DID KNOW WHAT LOCKING CAPS MEAN. This better for you, or am I being rude?
JJJ

Azrael
01-13-2003, 02:45 PM
apart from that it seems obvious that this "JOHN JAUNESE" and you are the same person - dont think of us as fools - i just looked at his blurb and saw the proof there that you and him are the same:

You are having some very unique typos all the time like "instramentation", "differant", "Defantly" etc.. well - john jaunese seems to have that same writing disability:

Interests:MUSIC,SPORTS, "ASTRONAMY"

so first:
grow up - how old are you? 10? 12?

second:
stop impersonating other dudes - if you need some attention then get a life

third:
how would you like if i just emailed the original John Jaunese that some lil kid is posting stuff in his name?

James or lali - will one of you please take care of this? Thanx!

aiwass
01-13-2003, 02:47 PM
THE John Jaunese? Cool. We need a new virtuoso here, cuz Lali hasn't been around in a while. Welcome on the board.

Regarding what that dude just said about Beck: Just because they were both in the Yardbirds and came from the same place at the same time, there is no comparison between the two. Beck is a virtuoso. No speed demon, but he has tone control rivaling Allan Holdsworth, not to mention whammy bar technique that KILLS Steve Vai. Plus, he is a master of slide guitar as well.

Azrael
01-13-2003, 02:48 PM
oh yes - and dont think you can change that now- i have a screenshot.

plus that last post of mr "JAUNESE" proved to me that it is not him - he (according to the email you posted) would not react like this.

aiwass
01-13-2003, 02:49 PM
Oh no! It's not John Jaunese? (sob! whimper!)

It's a cruel world...

JOHN JAUNESE
01-13-2003, 02:54 PM
REST ASSURED IT'S REALLY JOHN JAUNESE. ANY DOUBTS? GO TO GUITARNINE WEBSITE AND E-MAIL ME

[Edited by JOHN JAUNESE on 01-13-2003 at 10:53 PM]

Azrael
01-13-2003, 02:55 PM
if so, then take my apology - if not - get out!

aiwass
01-13-2003, 02:58 PM
Not exactly every time we have celebs here. I feel like a redneck upon the arrival of a stranger from the city.


"Damn cityfolk!* (Spitting chew tobacco)

JOHN JAUNESE
01-13-2003, 03:05 PM
MAN THIS FORUM IS A ROUGH CROUD. NOBODY E-MAILED ME FOR PROOF SO I GUESS THATS SETTLED.
JJAUNESE@AOL.COM
JJJ

aiwass
01-13-2003, 03:17 PM
We're not rough. We're just used to lots of newbie assholes. If you are who you are, however, I doubt we have to look at you as a newbie:)

aiwass
01-13-2003, 03:21 PM
By the way, it would kick ass if you could post some tricks.

JOHN JAUNESE
01-13-2003, 03:33 PM
I AM GOING TO PUT ALL MY TUNES ON POWERTAB. JUST DOWNLOAD POWERTAB EDITOR AND YOUR READY TO GO. ITS ALOT OF WORK. THINK OF HOW MANY NOTES MIGHT BE IN A NEO-CLASSICAL METAL TUNE. IF YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT POWERTAB MAN ARE YOU IN FOR A TREAT! MOST SHRED STUFF IS ON POWERTAB ALREADY.
JJJ

aiwass
01-13-2003, 03:35 PM
Hm... I'm using Guitar Pro already...

Oh well, I guess power tab will do.

And then I'll translate it all into guitar pro so all the guitar pro users can get a hold of it. Sound cool?

noticingthemistake
01-13-2003, 03:43 PM
Kool. Thats what I use also, POWERTAB. Works nice for guitar midi stuff. I love it.

"187" AWESOME!!! :D

zepp_rules
01-13-2003, 05:43 PM
JJJ, welcome to the forum man. despite Azzy's rough welcome, this is probably the best forum on the net. i hope you stay, we could learn a lot from you. it would be interesting.

Azrael
01-14-2003, 01:43 AM
Look - it´s not my goal to piss peeps off. nore do i want to chase away the newbies - as zeppo said we are used to strange members - and it realy seemed to me that you and the other dude are the same person. that´s no offense against the real you if it is you, because if you are you then he is not you which means that i was wrong and i´m sorry.. (now i´m confused). And if you is you then i´m quite happy to have you (i hope you are you) on this board and who knows - maybe if you are you then you might be in the host section too.

(.... goes and sees a doc)

Azrael
01-14-2003, 01:44 AM
.. now that even rhymed! *LOL*

rh287
01-14-2003, 01:54 AM
I would not impersonate anyone. The John in question was and is really John.
I am sure JJJ holds no grudges. If he didn't towards me and my origional email to him, there's NO WAY he could hold a grude at you.

No I'm not his promotor, just like his style and disapline.

Just a real virtuoso on the forum, and that's a fact.
Cool don't you think.
But if you still don't believe it, just email him f/ the site where you can download the songs, Thats proof enough.

mc9mm
01-14-2003, 05:16 AM
Virtuoso or not, whats the deal, is his caps lock button stuck?

Azrael
01-14-2003, 05:41 AM
seems so - maybe he should get a new keyboard *LOL*

aiwass
01-14-2003, 10:52 AM
Yo Az! What does your signature thing say?

Azrael
01-14-2003, 11:09 AM
it says:

"Wake up, cruel Redhorn! May thy bloodstained horn fall down on the enemies heads."

Its the Weather-Spell Saruman casts to release that avalance from the Caradhras (Redhorn)

aiwass
01-14-2003, 11:12 AM
Cool. The sublime connection between metal and Lord of The Rings...

JOHN JAUNESE
01-14-2003, 05:52 PM
Sorry about the locked caps. I have a long history of this. I am not as computer savy as most of you I would guess. One time I did a complete interview, and biography in locked caps(www.stephenross.com). I didn't have a bio so I had to sit there, and type one in from memmory. I didn't even have a comp til five years ago. pathetic huh?

JJJ

mc9mm
01-15-2003, 01:33 PM
Well now this is much better.
I thought you were this loud, annoying person, but
maybe you're not after all.
Maybe this shows the importance of "netiquette".

This thread has gone ballistic.
I can hardly remember what this thread is really about.

aiwass
01-15-2003, 01:36 PM
It was about the mystique surrounding the unknown shredder John Jaunese. Now there is no mystique, and he is no longer unknown.

Benoit
01-15-2003, 07:40 PM
Well I haven't really followed that thread completely but you should apply to be host JJJ.

Your skills would be very usefull to the community. Well, you would have to pass the vote like anybody else but still would be nice to have someone with your experience.

Your call but I think you would have good things to bring to the site.

Even if speed doesn't impress me anymore, I'm sure a lot of members would benefit from your experience and that's what this site is about.

JOHN JAUNESE
01-15-2003, 08:24 PM
Thanks. I think guys like you, and Azi make great hosts. Not sure what I could bring to the table. I don't teach, or anything like that anymore. I will look into it, but like I said I'm not a teacher. If one of the hosts wanted to mediate a lesson, or idea through me I would do it.
JJJ

Benoit
01-15-2003, 10:28 PM
Well, I'm not that good at theory. Never had theory lessons and don't have the patience to learn it myself.

Could use the help to anwser some member's questions. I also had an idea for a lesson but don't have the knowledge to back it up. That what you get for not doing your homework :)

Interrested?

JOHN JAUNESE
01-15-2003, 11:27 PM
Yes, that would be great.
Some members have already asked me questions in e-mail. Nobody has asked me anything at this forum, and I find that odd.

JJJ

rh287
01-16-2003, 06:41 AM
Have you guys noticed the number of people who have read this this thread in only a little less than three days?
And all the posts? what happens to them? Do you only have a certain amount of disk space available for each post? As I can't find all 60 or so. Thought they would be cool to read.
Thanks

aiwass
01-16-2003, 10:29 AM
Make a new forum: "Ask John!"

Musikian
04-18-2006, 01:42 PM
I like Rusty Cooley. He`s quite hilary house and sik! I very injoy that stuff, and now im learning it, wish me luck, check him out a lot u must...bout 20 notes a second I think, thats 1200 a minute. Great fun to watch.

Akira
04-18-2006, 02:23 PM
I like Rusty Cooley. He`s quite hilary house and sik! I very injoy that stuff, and now im learning it, wish me luck, check him out a lot u must...bout 20 notes a second I think, thats 1200 a minute. Great fun to watch.

Great fun to watch.

Awful to listen to.