PDA

View Full Version : recording mic vs. performance mic


acapella
05-29-2006, 12:21 PM
I was just checking out some microphones, and they're divided into "performance" (which I assume means live, on stage, etc.) and "recording" categories. What exactly is the difference between a performance mic and a recording mic? And if you can only get one of the two, which would be used for both perfromance and recording (vocal), which would it be?

Kevin Taylor
05-29-2006, 01:15 PM
I was just checking out some microphones, and they're divided into "performance" (which I assume means live, on stage, etc.) and "recording" categories. What exactly is the difference between a performance mic and a recording mic? And if you can only get one of the two, which would be used for both perfromance and recording (vocal), which would it be?

This is a real basic description but:

Performance mics are usually stuff like the Shure SM58. A dynamic mic that can take a lot of abuse (both physically on the road and in terms of loud noises as well). They're sometimes unidirectional to make them less subseptible to feedback.

Recording mics are usually condensor or ribbon mics. They're more sensitive and not able to take the shock from loud noises or getting banged around.
They're omnidirectional or have switchable pickup patterns.
They usually run on 48v Phantom power which means they either use a built in battery, or they're powered from the mixer.

If you could only get one of the two, it would depend on what it's main use would be for.
If you're in a band and playing live a lot, or want to record anything from vocals to loud kick drums or crash cymbals, go with the performance mic. (Dynamic Shure SM58 for instance)

If you're looking for a nice sounding mic that really makes vocals or acoustic guitar stand out and will be mainly using it in the studio, go with a recording mic. (Condenser, Rode NT-1 for instance)

suicidalmoose
05-29-2006, 04:07 PM
if you use a condensor mic u probably need a pop filter too, and they're a bit pricey for a good one, hard rock - a dynamic mic might be better anyways, for clean vocals a condensor mic would be awesome. you probably need a mixer or something to phantom power it because most (i'm pretty sure) don't have 9v battery options.

6strngs_2hmbkrs
05-29-2006, 06:26 PM
well, schmage already described the difference. I think that for your application, a dynamic mic like a shure SM58 or SM57 would be your best bet

magicninja
05-29-2006, 06:30 PM
Yeah Schmange nailed it.

Kevin Taylor
05-29-2006, 06:50 PM
well, schmage already described the difference. I think that for your application, a dynamic mic like a shure SM58 or SM57 would be your best bet

argh $%^#$@$

SCHMANGE!!!http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/bbs/images/smiles/cmd_cartmansopissedrightnow.gif

Lordathestrings
05-29-2006, 08:35 PM
argh $%^#$@$

SCHMANGE!!!http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/bbs/images/smiles/cmd_cartmansopissedrightnow.gif

:D .........

magicninja
05-29-2006, 08:46 PM
I know better by now. If Schmange is in your text triple check it.

6strngs_2hmbkrs
05-30-2006, 12:00 AM
argh $%^#$@$

SCHMANGE!!!http://www.southparkstudios.com/fans/bbs/images/smiles/cmd_cartmansopissedrightnow.gif
holy ****!!!! don't kill me!

it was just a typo, I swear to god! I know it's SCHMANGE!!!! and it's pronounced "sh-main-j"